

Is Adam Scine delusional?
By: Alberico | August 13th, 2008
I woke up here in New Jersey on a beautiful Wednesday morning, beautiful blue sky, barely any clouds, comfortable weather, and then sat down at my office and completely ruined my day. Why? Cause I read something stupid on Goal.com regarding Sampdoria and whether or not they would be competitive enough this year to repeat what happened last season. All thanks go to the genius Adam Scime who wrote the piece, and I guess he didn’t do much research before writing it. If you also want your day to be ruined you can go check the article yourself at http://www.goal.com/en-US/articolo.aspx?contenutoid=813373 (my link thingie wasnt working).
.
There are just certain things I have to get off my chest before I start taking my anger out at my fellow co-workers. Mr. Scime made very little of Sampdoria’s summer signings and instead highlighted their losses, to be precise he mentioned Maggio, Volpi, and Zenoni. I quickly went to my statistics and would like everyone to know the truth. Volpi, the former skipper, is 34 years old. He appeared in 28 games last year and had a very poor season. He, contrary to Mr. Scime’s opinion, DID NOT CONTROL the midfield. If you watched the games, it was Palombo & Sammarco who dictated and controlled the game, which is why Palombo became quickly the captain and the team leader while Volpi became a spectator. Next, it is plain ridiculous to mention Zenoni as a loss as he appeared in only 16 games and I dont even remember him playing. (I guess he really stood out).
Then there is Maggio. No one can downplay his season. BUT, arguments can be made because that was his first good season in his career and we do not know if he can repeat that. And secondly, we have done enough to replace him. Marius Stankevicius, the Lithuanian national team member has had 157 caps in Italian football and 38 in international football, and some of the things he has done in the first 3 preseason games have already given Sampdoria fans bright hope for the future. Not to mention the 2 South American signings who are both considered starlets. Bottinelli has already capped twice for Argentina, and Fornaroli just came off a campaing where he scored 16 goals in 25 games. AND HE’S ONLY 20!.
For a team that usually loses most of its players in the transfer market every season, I would say that this was the best summer in a long time. We held onto Cassano until 2013, we kept Palombo who was rumored to Fiorentina, we held Campagnaro who was rumored to Juventus. That is hard for a team to do. But we finally did it. And I advise Mr. Scime to start watching the youth players Samp jsut put on their roster. You know, the guys who just beat mighty Inter for the Primavera crown, Samp’s first ever Primavera Scudetto. Just watch what guys like Poli, Marilungo, Eramo, Fiorillo and company will do. I actually believe Samp got better this season. We will settle this when the chips are on the table and it’s time to count. Now I have to go try make my day better. Maybe I’ll go watch some Cassano highlights or something. Hey, at least Volpi controlled the midfield, right?
| Serie A Match Schedule | Discount Travel to Genoa | |||
| Sampdoria Results | Stadio Luigi Ferraris information & hotels |
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



I know it’s hard, but you just have to take verything thats posted up at goal.com with a grain of salt.. especially in the summer. They’re desperate for stories and more often than not end up posting idiotic things such as that.
Posted from
United States

-



Where in New Jersey are you at Alberico? Bergen county?
Posted from
United States

-



Tommy I am in Hudson County, and lgarzone i guess you are right, but still. goal.com has a pretty huge community so i would expect something better than that. it really misinforms people and if anyone ever knows im wrong, i want them to tell me, i have no problem being corrected…i appreciate it actually
Posted from
United States

-



two jersey guys? i’m in union county haha
Posted from
United States

-



Their editorials are hard-core hit-or-miss. Sometimes I swear they read The Offside because they post exactly about what we’re discussing. Or sometimes they post inflammatory stupid blogs with half truths (like Sampdorias market) because they either have nothing better to do or to try and get more buzz on their article.
Posted from
United States

-



it just makes no sense. you have to take pride in what you post or else you misinform people. so far, i love the offside.com bloggers
Posted from
United States

-



Alberico – as others have mentioned, the first problem was going to goal.com for information. To let this guy Adam “Scimmia” dictate his thoughts on Sampdoria’s market is like trying to listen to British announcers’ commentary on Italian calcio. It’s just hopeless…hehe
Posted from
United States

-



oh no i dont go there for information. I just go there to read what they say. Any valuable information i get for Sampdoria is from gazzetta and sampdoria’s main website. i just like to see how terrible some opinion articles are. hehe. oh and you are right, no Brits for calcio lol unless it’s andy gray
Posted from
United States

-



ah goal.com, the same people that said “Cassano has been lighting up the preseason with Sampdoria” when Cassano was still on vacation.
Posted from
United States

-



Hello Alberico,
I agree mr. scime’s research was not very deep into samp, but i also know goal.com limits the length of these editorials and thus they usually leave out one side of the story. also, mr. scine has made some otehr good editorials about rome, milan, fiorentina, and napoli.
it is afterall a debate and that may just be his opinion on samp, i bet you could find otehrs on goal.com who think the opposite, dont let his ignorance ruin your day
Posted from
Canada

-



alberico, you also (like adam scime) left out some things while commenting on his article, reading it i see his main point is that the ambition of samp doesnt match napoli or florence, ic ant see how you would disagree. you’re article here is no better than his as you failed to address many of his main poins and only focused on the negative. as well you make it seem like he compeltely cut up samp, which he didnt do…really…you accuse him of one thing then do the same
Posted from
Canada

-



i dont think i need to point out the things i agree with. i just did not like what was said negatively. since he wrote the initial article, mine is a response, so i didnt feel the need to do so. and i really dont do the same, actually what i did is complete his article by pointing out the things he left out. it’s OK to disagree Victor.
Posted from
United States

-



i was on vacation this week so sorry to all readers, i will be posting later today. thanks for your patience
Posted from
United States

Comments are closed












